Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-03-26 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-03-26 House Journal Page 2449 HB 256 Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 256(JUD) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 256(JUD) was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 256(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(JUD)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 25 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Ramras, Roses, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Cissna, Doll, Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Holmes, Kerttula, Olson, Salmon, Seaton Excused: Foster, Kawasaki, Nelson And so, CSHB 256(JUD) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Samuels moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(JUD)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 27 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Keller, Kelly, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Roses, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson 2008-03-26 House Journal Page 2450 Nays: Cissna, Doogan, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Holmes, Kerttula, Salmon Excused: Foster, Kawasaki, Nelson Absent: Ramras And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 256(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.